Secure code review & codebase hardening
Find exploitable defects in your codebase and fix the engineering practices that let them in, with a risk-ranked backlog your team can actually action.
When this fits
- You are about to ship a system that handles sensitive data or money.
- You inherited a codebase with no security review history.
- You need evidence of due diligence for a client, insurer or regulator.
Decisions and outcomes
This service answers: where are we exposed, how bad is it, and what should we fix first.
Scope
Typically included
- Threat modelling for the reviewed component
- Manual review supported by tooling, not tooling output alone
- Risk-ranked, actionable backlog
Not included unless agreed
- Full rewrite or ongoing development
- Infrastructure outside the agreed codebase
- A guarantee of zero remaining defects
Deliverables
- Threat model summary
- Findings with severity and reproduction detail
- Verification/retest report
Process
1. Authorise
Confirm ownership or authority over the codebase.
2. Scope
Agree languages, components and depth of review.
3. Review
Manual review supported by static analysis tooling.
4. Report and remediate
Deliver findings, then verify fixes on request.
Methods and standards
[Pending: exact supported languages/frameworks/build systems – TBD-005].
Security and evidence
No public evidence upload
This page never accepts malware, source code or evidence. Secure transfer is agreed only after authorisation and scoping, outside this website.
Limitations
What this engagement cannot promise
A code review cannot prove the complete absence of defects, only that the reviewed scope was examined to the agreed depth.
Proof
No approved proof for this service yet
Case studies, sample reports and named experts will appear here once approved for publication.
Ready to talk about your situation?
Tell us the high-level scope. No malware, source code or evidence – just enough for us to route you safely.